Victoria Monét Previews ‘Frequency of Love’ Album With New Song ‘Reach Out’ ⁠25%

By Malik Davis⁠3%

7/22/2026, 10:21:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 311 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (16,405 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the article peer group.

Victoria Monet is officially entering a new era. 
The Grammy-winning singer-songwriter has announced her sophomore album, Frequency of Love, which will arrive on Oct. 2 via Lovett Music/RCA Records. 
She also shared the lead single, “Reach Out,” produced by frequent collaborators Kaytranada and D’Mile. 
The accompanying Dave Meyers-directed video features choreography by Sean Bankhead. 
The visual follows the singer as she performs in an all-black ensemble, leading an army of backup dancers on a journey to send a message to a long-term love interest. 
“I am so thankful to everyone who was a part of this piece of art!! 
I couldn’t have done it without every single one of you,” Monét wrote on Instagram, marking the video's release. 
The announcement of Frequency of Love comes as Monet continues to build momentum. 
Her recent single, “Let Me,” climbed to the Number One spot on Billboard’s Adult R&B Airplay chart in June. 
Frequency of Love marks Monet’s first full-length studio album since Jaguar II and Jaguar II: Deluxe, the projects that produced hit singles including “On My Mama” and “Smoke.” 
Jaguar II earned Monet her first Grammy Awards for Best R&B Album, Best New Artist, and Best Engineered Album, Non-Classical at the 2024 Grammys. 
“I have this notebook that I keep on the side of my bed that I write in if I wake up and have a dream that I can remember, or just things that I feel, or positive things that I want to tell myself when I’m feeling doubtful,” she said. 
Outside of her own music, Monet is currently wrapping up the European and U.K. leg of Bruno Mars’ The Romantic tour as a special guest alongside Anderson . 
Paak as DJ Pee . 
Wee. 
The run concludes at London’s Wembley Stadium on July 24, 25, and 28. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.2%Malik Davis: 1.3%Rolling Stone: 2.9%Confirmation Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 3.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.6%Rolling Stone: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.4%Rolling Stone: 5.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.9%Malik Davis: 3.0%Rolling Stone: 2.0%Optimism Bias20.9%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 1.4%Rolling Stone: 7.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.6%Rolling Stone: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Malik Davis: 3.3%Rolling Stone: 4.8%Halo Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Malik Davis: 0.8%Rolling Stone: 1.3%Recency Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.7%Malik Davis: 1.0%Rolling Stone: 3.4%Appeal to Authority7.7%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.7%Rolling Stone: 5.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.7%Rolling Stone: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.2%Malik Davis: 2.1%Rolling Stone: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.6%Malik Davis: 1.2%Rolling Stone: 2.4%Anecdotal9.6%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.8%Malik Davis: 3.1%Rolling Stone: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.8%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.9%Malik Davis: 2.0%Rolling Stone: 1.5%Unattributed Quote10.9%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.6%Malik Davis: 4.7%Rolling Stone: 8.6%Biased Writer Voice11.6%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malik Davis: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Malik Davis: 1.6%Rolling Stone: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.2%

311 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker27%attributed speech227writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageVictoria Monét • 15 words • 100.0% coverageVictoria Monét • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageVictoria Monét • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Victoria Monét

100%flagged-word coverage
84 attributed words100% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+40.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Victoria Monét: 40.5%40.5%Attempt to Sell a Product -18.1 ptsWriter: 18.1%Victoria Monét: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Victoria Monét: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.