Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reach Out results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 432 faulty-reasoning hits from 933 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,072 of 16,562 topics). This Reach Out is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Reach Out
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 933
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.4% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles933 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos