Author summary
3%3 analyzed articles/videos311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malik Davis results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 710 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,507 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,312 of 6,498 authors). This Malik Davis is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Malik Davis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
19%Malik Davis (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,507
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate