Author summary
69%3 analyzed articles/videos372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Haysom results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 378 hits. Analysis detected 2,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,707 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,174 of 6,244 authors). This Sam Haysom is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Sam Haysom
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
82%Sam Haysom (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,707
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.6%16.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.7%5.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos