Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos1,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leena Nasir results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 3,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,614 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,727 of 6,630 authors). This Leena Nasir is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Leena Nasir
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
14%Leena Nasir (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,614
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

14% percentile
025507510013.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate