Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leena Nasir results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 497 hits . Analysis detected 3,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,614 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,727 of 6,630 authors). This Leena Nasir is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Leena Nasir
Author details
Total words: 6,614
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst