Keyword summary
68% 32 analyzed articles/videos 20,434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Politics results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 12,563 hits . Analysis detected 108,989 faulty-reasoning hits from 108,135 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,160 of 37,530 keywords). This California Politics is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. California Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 108,135
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score32 analyzed articles108.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst