Keyword summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Race results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,060 hits . Analysis detected 6,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,585 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,836 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Race is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Presidential Race
Keyword details
Total words: 4,585
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.1% 23.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.8% 18.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst