Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francois Valentin results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 518 hits . Analysis detected 3,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,890 of 6,357 authors). This Francois Valentin is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Francois Valentin
Author details
Total words: 2,584
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.5% 18.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.1% 20.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst