Author summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madeline Halpert results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 582 faulty-reasoning hits from 855 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (1,496 of 6,603 authors). This Madeline Halpert is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
Madeline Halpert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠78%Madeline Halpert (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 855
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510077.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles855 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos