Breitbart81%

Trump: SAVE America Act ‘Even More Important’ After Supreme Court Mail-In Ballot Ruling 38%

By Elizabeth Weibel68%

6/29/2026, 3:14:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 570 faulty-reasoning hits from 419 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.1% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,603 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump explained that passing the SAVE America Act is “even more important” after the Supreme Court ruled that states that have laws allowing mail-in ballots to be counted after election day are not violating federal law. 
After the president signed executive orders, Townhall reporter Cameron Arcand asked him what he thought about the Supreme Court’s ruling, and “what comes next for the SAVE Act.” 
Trump described the ruling as “detrimental to honest elections,” and also stated it “gives people more time to vote illegally.” 
“Mr. 
President, what do you make of the Supreme Court ruling today, in regards to the mail-in ballots, and what comes next for the SAVE Act after today's ruling?” 
Arcand asked. 
“Because of the mail-in ballot ruling  which was a little bit surprising, gives people more time to vote illegally  the SAVE Act is even more important. 
…You have to be a citizen of our country, okay, you have to show you’re a citizen of our country, called citizenship.” 
Trump answered. 
“Voter ID by photo, photo voter ID, and no mail-in ballots  unless you’re in the military, disabled, you’re ill, or you’re away even on a vacation, we’re being very open about it. 
It’s pretty easy, and we’ll have honest elections.” 
“The ruling, which a lot of people were waiting for, that was a ruling that was  I think it was very detrimental to honest elections,” Trump continued. 
“But it is what it is.” 
Breitbart News's John Binder reported that the Supreme Court “issued a 5-4 ruling that permits states to count mail-in ballots  sent on or before election day.” 
Binder noted: 
> On Monday, SCOTUS issued a 5-4 ruling that permits states to count mail-in ballots  sent on or before election day  that are received by state election officials after election day. 
> 
> Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority’s opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. 
> 
> “Two principles are important here. 
First, post-election day receipt, considered on its own, does not conflict with the election-day statutes,” the Court writes. 
Trump's comment about how the SAVE America Act is even more important in light of the Supreme Court's ruling comes several days after he stated he was canceling a signing ceremony for the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act until the Senate passes the SAVE America Act. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.9%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.8%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.3%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.4%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias1.9%This article: 5.3%Elizabeth Weibel: 12.4%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.9%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 3.1%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.0%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Elizabeth Weibel: 9.1%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias11.5%This article: 4.8%Elizabeth Weibel: 4.5%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.5%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 3.7%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.0%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.3%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.2%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.1%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 3.9%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.0%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.2%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.4%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority17.2%This article: 7.9%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.2%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma7.9%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.7%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.9%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.5%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization1.9%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.6%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 9.9%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 1.4%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.5%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 27.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.9%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)27.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.8%Elizabeth Weibel: 4.4%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal4.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.3%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.8%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.2%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.4%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.2%This article: 7.9%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.8%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection7.9%This article: 6.7%Elizabeth Weibel: 2.6%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 1.5%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 5.9%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Weibel: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

419 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers59%attributed speech171writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageCameron Arcand • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 28 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 33 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Binder • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Binder • 33 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Binder • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Binder • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Binder • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Binder • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
125 attributed words50% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice+22.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 22.4%22.4%Unattributed Quote-0.6 ptsWriter: 0.6%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.