Author summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cass Rutledge results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 64.3% saturation with 1,183 hits. Analysis detected 5,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,839 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (464 of 6,348 authors). This Cass Rutledge is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Cass Rutledge
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠93%Cass Rutledge (selected)9%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,839
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510092.7% percentile
8.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 64.3%64.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 49.5%49.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 26.5%26.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.9%9.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.9%12.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.5%15.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.9%7.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 64.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 49.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 26.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 12.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 11.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos