Breitbart81%

Arkansas Democrat Hallie Shoffner Would Defund ICE 31%

By Jasmyn Jordan69% #author72%

7/9/2026, 11:32:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Red Herring, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 2,067 faulty-reasoning hits from 831 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,169 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the article peer group.

Arkansas Democratic Senate candidate Hallie Shoffner, who is challenging Sen. 
Tom Cotton (R-AR), said she would vote to defund ICE as it exists now and accused the government of treating immigrants, including “undocumented” immigrants, as enemies. 
In a clip provided exclusively to Breitbart News from June during an Immigrant Heritage Month Exposition sponsored by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), an attendee asked Shoffner what she would do “for the immigrant community, for the undocumented community.” 
“Well, I think one of the things we have to do first is we have to address the fact that we no longer respect law and order in this country,” Shoffner responded. 
“The first thing to know is that the immigrant community in Arkansas, in the United States, and I don’t care whether these are folks that have documents or not, this is a community that is essential to the fabric, the social, cultural, and economic fabric of this country, that is number one.” 
“Number two, folks talk about securing the border. 
They talk about supporting violent criminals, but that is not what is happening right now,” she continued. 
“Right now, the government is treating an entire community as if they were an enemy, and then they are punishing those who step up for them, and that has to stop.” 
Shoffner said people ask her, “What is the purpose of government when it comes to immigration?” 
“Number one, enforce good laws. 
Number two, don’t make laws that don’t make sense. 
Number three, treat human beings like human beings, and number four, don’t be an asshole,” Shoffner said. 
“And that’s exactly what our government is doing right now,” she added. 
Shoffner said the United States needs to “fix immigration” while recognizing that people in the country, “whether they have documents or not,” are contributing to the economy. 
“But what we have to recognize is the folks that are here, whether they have documents or not, are contributing to the small business economy, and the small business economy is what runs America,” Shoffner said. 
“Why not create an immigration system that does two things? 
Number one, with human dignity at the forefront, and number two, it asks small businesses and the immigrants themselves, ‘What do you need to be successful? 
Not just to contribute to your community and your family, but to the economic fabric of this country.’ 
That’s how I want to help.” 
Shoffner was then asked, “So, would you vote to defund ICE?” 
“I would vote to defund ICE as it exists right now,” Shoffner said. 
“Immigration and customs enforcement was created not that long ago, and it no longer serves the purpose it was originally created for. 
I would not spend one more dime on ICE not just because of the human dignity issue, but also the fact that it is now the largest law enforcement agency in the country.” 
“It has 10 times the budget of the organization that fights child sex trafficking,” she continued. 
“Let’s not spend one more dime until we start fixing the real issues that’s happening, which is the fact that we’re the hungriest state in the country. 
There are 180,000 hungry children in Arkansas. 
Why don’t we start talking about that?” 
Arkansas Secretary of State Cole Jester exclusively told Breitbart News, “I wake up thankful for the men and women of ICE who are risking their safety every single day. 
Anyone who does not support their mission is fundamentally unsuited to represent Arkansas.” 
Samantha Cantrell of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) said in a statement to Breitbart News, “Hallie Shoffner wants to defund ICE because she supports Kamala Harris’s open-border policies that would make Arkansas less safe. 
Shoffner is a radical leftist pretending to be a moderate farmer  what a total liberal fraud.” 
Shoffner served as executive director of Seis Puentes, a Little Rock-based nonprofit, and told the Arkansas Times in 2012 that one of the group’s goals was helping “undocumented Hispanics” navigate American systems and “engage them in the process.” 
Seis Puentes also partnered with the City of North Little Rock to help illegal immigrants obtain “valid photo ID,” allowing them to more easily access public services. 
Shoffner previously hired a marketing company to rebrand herself as “FarmHer Hallie.” 
Shoffner is Arkansas’s Democratic nominee challenging Sen. 
Tom Cotton (R-AR) in a state President Donald Trump won by more than 30 points in 2024. 
Although Shoffner has branded herself as a farmer who is “not much for political parties,” Breitbart News reported in May that her campaign paid $47,500 to Good Influence, a Louisville-based digital and influencer firm also used by Maine Democrat Senate candidate Graham Platner. 
Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin criticized the connection at the time, saying Shoffner and Platner “share the same values.” 
Platner later suspended his Senate campaign on July 8 after sexual assault allegations prompted scores of Democrats to call for him to step down, though he denied the allegations. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.7%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.5%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.8%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic6.3%This article: 9.5%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.2%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic9.5%This article: 2.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.1%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.4%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 11.0%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.1%Jasmyn Jordan: 5.0%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias7.1%This article: 4.7%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.1%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.7%This article: 35.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 6.3%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias35.0%This article: 0.7%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.4%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.6%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.4%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias5.2%This article: 2.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.7%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.0%This article: 1.6%Jasmyn Jordan: 3.8%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.2%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 5.3%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Jasmyn Jordan: 3.5%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem3.6%This article: 2.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man2.0%This article: 7.3%Jasmyn Jordan: 4.5%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority7.3%This article: 1.2%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.3%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma1.2%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.9%Jasmyn Jordan: 9.0%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization8.9%This article: 14.8%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring14.8%This article: 6.3%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon6.3%This article: 22.5%Jasmyn Jordan: 7.5%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion22.5%This article: 4.1%Jasmyn Jordan: 2.2%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question4.1%This article: 7.5%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.3%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.5%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.3%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division4.3%This article: 1.9%Jasmyn Jordan: 3.0%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal1.9%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.6%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 6.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy6.0%This article: 0.0%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.7%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.3%Jasmyn Jordan: 1.0%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.3%This article: 10.8%Jasmyn Jordan: 3.2%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice10.8%This article: 5.2%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination5.2%This article: 17.2%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias17.2%This article: 6.3%Jasmyn Jordan: 4.9%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias6.3%This article: 3.2%Jasmyn Jordan: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.2%

831 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers67%attributed speech271writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 32 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 52 words • 100.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 8 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 17 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 31 words • 100.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 5 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 9 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 17 words • 100.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 12 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 27 words • 100.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 36 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 10 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 26 words • 100.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 13 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 22 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 33 words • 100.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 27 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 7 words • 0.0% coverageHallie Shoffner • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCole Jester • 29 words • 100.0% coverageCole Jester • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSamantha Cantrell • 35 words • 100.0% coverageSamantha Cantrell • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageTim Griffin • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Samantha Cantrell

100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words9.3% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Samantha Cantrell: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+57.7 ptsWriter: 9.6%Samantha Cantrell: 67.3%67.3%Quote-first Misdirection-16.2 ptsWriter: 16.2%Samantha Cantrell: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%Samantha Cantrell: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.