Keyword summary
87% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Cotton results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 3,186 hits . Analysis detected 25,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,070 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,586 of 37,536 keywords). This Tom Cotton is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Tom Cotton
Keyword details
Total words: 18,070
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.6% 17.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst