Speaker summary
85%3 analyzed articles/videos193.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Cantrell results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 57% saturation with 110.222 hits. Analysis detected 917.028 faulty-reasoning hits from 193.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (18,190 of 28,364 speakers). This Samantha Cantrell is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Samantha Cantrell
Speaker details
Total words: 193.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
22.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos193.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 57.0%57.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 44.5%44.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.8%38.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.7%19.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 18.2%18.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 57.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 44.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate