Speaker summary
85% 3 analyzed articles/videos 193.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Cantrell results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 57% saturation with 110.222 hits . Analysis detected 917.028 faulty-reasoning hits from 193.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (18,190 of 28,364 speakers). This Samantha Cantrell is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Samantha Cantrell
Speaker details
Total words: 193.333
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 22.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos193.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 57.0% 57.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 44.5% 44.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 29.7% 29.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 26.1% 26.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 38.8% 38.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 21.7% 21.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 19.7% 19.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 18.2% 18.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 21.0% 21.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Ad Hominem: Speaker 57.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 44.5%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 4.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 26.9% Straw Man: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst