Author summary
30% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,900 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cassandra Isobelle Flores results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,864 hits . Analysis detected 17,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,301 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (6,036 of 6,628 authors). This Cassandra Isobelle Flores is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Cassandra Isobelle Flores
Author details
Total words: 28,301
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles28.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst