Author summary
14%7 analyzed articles/videos2,852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Younker results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 938 hits. Analysis detected 8,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,098 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,133 of 6,204 authors). This Emily Younker is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Emily Younker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
18%Emily Younker (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,098
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate