Author summary
38%2 analyzed articles/videos1,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chihiro Kai results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 3,401 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,414 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,538 of 6,348 authors). This Chihiro Kai is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Chihiro Kai
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
45%Chihiro Kai (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,414
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate