Author summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 11,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celisa Calacal results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 3,630 hits . Analysis detected 36,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,305 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (5,785 of 6,137 authors). This Celisa Calacal is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Celisa Calacal
Author details
Total words: 57,305
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score15 analyzed articles57.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst