Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Lonergan results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 955 hits . Analysis detected 6,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,080 of 6,348 authors). This Brian Lonergan is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Brian Lonergan
Author details
Total words: 3,252
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.0% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 29.4% 29.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Author 9.1%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst