Author summary
0% 18 analyzed articles/videos 14,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Munoz results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 8,191 hits . Analysis detected 56,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,222 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,914 of 6,169 authors). This Brian Munoz is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Brian Munoz
Author details
Total words: 62,222
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score18 analyzed articles62.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst