Author summary
0% 20 analyzed articles/videos 13,948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lilley Halloran results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 5,823 hits . Analysis detected 43,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,104 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,483 of 6,215 authors). This Lilley Halloran is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Lilley Halloran
Author details
Total words: 56,104
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score20 analyzed articles56.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst