Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlotte Keene results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , In-Group Bias , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 763 hits . Analysis detected 3,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,984 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,160 of 6,244 authors). This Charlotte Keene is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Charlotte Keene
Author details
Total words: 4,984
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst