A St. Louis judge denies ousted Sheriff Alfred Montgomery’s request for a new trial 29%

By Chad Davis0% Brian Munoz0%

4/17/2026, 8:51:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 390 faulty-reasoning hits from 474 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.4% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,114 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the article peer group.

Ousted St. 
Louis Sheriff Alfred Montgomery will not get another trial, retired Circuit Judge Steven R. 
Ohmer ruled Friday. 
The decision is the latest in the monthslong civil saga between the embattled former sheriff and Missouri. 
In December, Ohmer removed Montgomery from office after the state brought a quo warranto against Montgomery that included six arguments for why the then-sheriff should be taken out of office. 
The judge said two of the charges merited Montgomery’s ouster: having then-acting jail commissioner Tammy Ross handcuffed and disarming former sheriff’s deputy Darryl Wilson. 
Ohmer said those actions went beyond the sheriff’s legal duties. 
Montgomery, who is in jail awaiting a separate federal trial, asked for a new trial in January, saying he should be partially removed from office instead. 
Lawyers for the former sheriff proposed that Montgomery remain in office in a limited capacity, including not being involved in internal affairs and criminal investigations. 
Montgomery’s lawyers also asked Ohmer to decide if the former sheriff had the authority to enforce general criminal law in the Ross and Wilson incidents. 
But Friday's ruling did not appear to clarify that question. 
The former sheriff was jailed last October after a federal judge ruled Montgomery violated his bond by using a burner phone to allegedly harass witnesses after being placed on house arrest. 
Ohmer appointed Judge Christopher E. 
McGraugh to pick Montgomery’s replacement, naming former Police Chief John Hayden Jr. as interim sheriff. 
Ohmer was brought out of retirement to rule on the removal suit. 
A date for Montgomery’s federal trial has not been set. 
Montgomery’s tenure has been marked by other disputes, including having former sheriff’s deputy Anthony Kirchner roll a pair of golden dice in order to keep his job and accusations of financial mismanagement. 
Montgomery also faces a slew of other legal troubles, including additional lawsuits from Wilson, Kirchner and one from Ross that was recently settled for roughly $50,000, according to records obtained by STLPR. 
In a statement following the ruling, a spokesperson for the sheriff’s office said the staff is working to rebuild trust with the community. 
“Interim Sheriff John Hayden is delivering on his promise to the people of St. 
Louis  restoring public trust, enhancing court safety, ensuring efficient prisoner transport, and elevating professionalism throughout the agency,” wrote John Gieseke, the sheriff’s chief of staff and spokesperson. 
“His commitment to fiscally responsible management and clear, consistent policies will continue to reflect a new standard of excellence for the City of St. 
Louis Sheriff’s Office.” 
Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway celebrated the decisions. 
"Our office will continue using the full force of the law to hold misconduct in public office accountable," she wrote in a statement. 
This story has been updated with a statement from Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Chad Davis: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Chad Davis: 4.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Chad Davis: 9.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias16.9%This article: 6.5%Chad Davis: 2.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.8%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority10.8%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.0%Chad Davis: 9.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion3.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.8%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal6.8%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection3.0%This article: 10.3%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice10.3%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

474 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers22%attributed speech369writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSteven R. Ohmer • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSteven R. Ohmer • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gieseke • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Gieseke • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gieseke • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gieseke • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCatherine Hanaway • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Catherine Hanaway

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words22% of attributed speech42% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.3 ptsWriter: 13.3%Catherine Hanaway: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.