Author summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 11,446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hiba Ahmad results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 4,344 hits . Analysis detected 36,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,043 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,453 of 6,315 authors). This Hiba Ahmad is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Hiba Ahmad
Author details
Total words: 47,043
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score14 analyzed articles47K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst