Topic summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos2,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abolish Ice results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 1,288 hits. Analysis detected 8,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,447 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,660 of 16,562 topics). This Abolish Ice is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Abolish Ice
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,447
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.0%20.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos