Author summary
⁠80%5 analyzed articles/videos5,618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Ludwig results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 3,751 hits. Analysis detected 31,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,842 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (3,463 of 6,171 authors). This Mike Ludwig is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Mike Ludwig
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠44%Mike Ludwig (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 25,842
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles25.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.9%13.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.5%14.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos