Keyword summary
⁠49%5 analyzed articles/videos2,909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abolish Ice results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,271 hits. Analysis detected 20,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,358 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (18,458 of 36,404 keywords). This Abolish Ice is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Abolish Ice
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠50%Abolish Ice (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.3%6.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos