Author summary
35% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kade Heather results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,813 hits . Analysis detected 14,046 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,656 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,687 of 6,628 authors). This Kade Heather is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Kade Heather
Author details
Total words: 16,656
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst