Rev. Michael Pfleger removed from St. Sabina Church amid investigation into decades-old sex abuse claim 24%

By Kade Heather35%

7/11/2026, 6:17:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 796 faulty-reasoning hits from 539 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (16,801 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the article peer group.

The Rev. 
Michael Pfleger has been removed from his ministry at St. 
Sabina Church as the Archdiocese of Chicago investigates a claim of child sexual abuse from more than 30 years ago. 
It’s the fifth decades-old accusation against the South Side priest in four years. 
Pfleger was cleared of the other accusations. 
In a letter to parishioners Saturday, Cardinal Blase Cupich said the alleged abuse happened at St. 
Sabina Church more than 30 years ago. 
He said Pfleger “strongly denied” the accusation. 
In a written statement, Pfleger called the allegation, "an absolute lie." 
Pfleger said he was informed of the accusation Thursday by the vicar of priests and told the accuser is a woman who went to school at St. 
Sabina and that she said she was sexually abused by Pfleger sometime between 1993 and 1995, when she was a minor. 
Pfleger said the accusation is "another attack by those who have sought to destroy me for years and another attempt by someone to get money from the archdiocese and to silence me. 
"Let me be clear, sexual abuse is wrong, and I realize that the Catholic church has a long history of not dealing with accusations and has spent a number of years putting strong policies in place, but I have said countless times I believe the current policy is wrong and unfair to the accused priest," Pfleger said. 
While delivering the "difficult news" to parishioners, Cupich wrote, “I want to stress that the welfare of the children entrusted to our care is our paramount concern. 
“The Archdiocese of Chicago takes all allegations of sexual misconduct seriously. 
We appreciate the courage it takes to step forward and encourage anyone who believes they have experienced abuse or inappropriate behavior by a member of the clergy, religious or lay employee of the archdiocese to report it to the Office for the Protection of Children and Youth.” 
The Archdiocese of Chicago’s Independent Review Board is investigating and will make a recommendation to Cupich. 
The Rev. 
Thulani Magwaza will continue to serve as pastor of St. 
Sabina Parish, Cupich said. 
Pfleger was first removed from St. 
Sabina in January 2021 after being accused of sexually abusing a minor more than 40 years earlier. 
Later that month, the brother of Pfleger’s first accuser came forward with his own accusations. 
After a five-month investigation into the claims involving the brothers, an archdiocese review board found “insufficient reason to suspect Father Pfleger is guilty of these allegations.” 
Pfleger returned to Sunday service in June 2021. 
Then, in March 2022, a 59-year-old man came forward to bolster the brothers’ claims, saying Pfleger molested him at St. 
Sabina when the man was 18. 
In October 2022, a man in his late 40s said Pfleger sexually abused him twice in the late 1980s. 
Pfleger, 77, has been the pastor at St. 
Sabina Church since 1981 and has become a leading voice against violence. 
Related 
Cupich accuses St. 
Sabina of ‘inappropriate and intimidating tactics’ toward Pfleger abuse investigators 
Pfleger still at forefront of anti-gun fight as he plans June march 
After warning from cardinal, St. 
Sabina pastor says he’s encouraging ‘respectful’ support for Pfleger 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 3.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Kade Heather: 7.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.9%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 3.7%Kade Heather: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.1%Kade Heather: 6.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 5.3%Framing Effect12.1%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.2%Kade Heather: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Status Quo Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.7%Kade Heather: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.6%Optimism Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 2.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Kade Heather: 7.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 7.9%Negativity Bias8.5%This article: 18.6%Kade Heather: 2.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 2.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Kade Heather: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.9%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Kade Heather: 3.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.6%Recency Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.0%Kade Heather: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.8%Appeal to Authority2.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 1.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.4%Kade Heather: 6.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.6%Hasty Generalization2.4%This article: 1.9%Kade Heather: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Red Herring1.9%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.3%Kade Heather: 10.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 5.5%Appeal to Emotion17.3%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.6%Kade Heather: 1.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.6%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.8%Kade Heather: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof4.8%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.0%Kade Heather: 2.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.1%Anecdotal15.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 2.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.9%Kade Heather: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading5.9%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Kade Heather: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.8%Unattributed Quote3.9%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.6%Kade Heather: 2.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.3%Biased Writer Voice10.6%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 5.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 1.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kade Heather: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

539 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers54%attributed speech246writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCardinal Blase Cupich • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCardinal Blase Cupich • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCardinal Blase Cupich • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Pfleger • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Pfleger • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Pfleger • 21 words • 100.0% coverageMichael Pfleger • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Pfleger • 57 words • 100.0% coverageCardinal Blase Cupich • 27 words • 0.0% coverageCardinal Blase Cupich • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCardinal Blase Cupich • 47 words • 0.0% coverageArchdiocese of Chicago’s Independent Review Board • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageCardinal Blase Cupich • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCardinal Blase Cupich • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael Pfleger

100%flagged-word coverage
148 attributed words51% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice+38.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Michael Pfleger: 38.5%38.5%Unattributed Quote+14.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Michael Pfleger: 14.2%14.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.