Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video197.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Pfleger results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Tu Quoque, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 63.9% saturation with 141.75 hits. Analysis detected 564.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 197.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,736 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Pfleger is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Michael Pfleger
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠34%Michael Pfleger (selected)22%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 197.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
21.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos197.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 63.9%63.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 38.5%38.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 38.5%38.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.3%19.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 63.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 1.5%Tu Quoque: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos