Breitbart82%

Obama-Appointed Judge Strikes Down Trump Order Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Vote in U.S. Elections 29%

By John Binder69%

6/24/2026, 4:43:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 364 faulty-reasoning hits from 369 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.4% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,120 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the article peer group.

A federal judge, appointed by former President Barack Obama, has permanently enjoined an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to reinforce election integrity by requiring proof of American citizenship to vote in federal elections, among other reforms. 
On Tuesday, Judge Denise Casper, appointed to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts by Obama in 2010, ruled that Trump’s executive order demanding that the Election Assistance Commission include a proof-of-American-citizenship requirement in its national mail voter registration form is unconstitutional. 
“The Court DECLARES that §§ 2(a), 3(d), 4(a), 7(a) and 7(b) of the Executive Order are unconstitutional and void because they are ultra vires and violate the separation of powers under the United States Constitution,” Casper writes: 
The Court PERMANENTLY ENJOINS Defendants, except President Trump, from taking any action to implement or enforce § 2(a) of the Executive Order or otherwise taking any steps to require documentary proof of citizenship as part of the federal mail-in voter registration form provided for in 52 U.S.C. 
§ 20508. 
The Court PERMANENTLY ENJOINS Defendants, except President Trump, from taking any action to implement or enforce § 3(d) of the Executive Order or otherwise taking any steps to alter the federal post card form provided for in 52 U.S.C. § 20301(b)(2) to require either documentary proof of citizenship or proof of eligibility to vote in elections in the State in which the voter is attempting to vote. 
Among other claims, Casper writes that there is no evidence that Trump’s executive order is necessary because “widespread” fraud in American elections seemingly does not exist. 
“On the other hand, there is no evidence in this record of widespread ‘illegal voting, discrimination, fraud, and other forms of malfeasance and error’ within American elections, which the Executive Order purports to safeguard against,” Casper writes. 
Last year, Casper issued a preliminary injunction against Trump’s order, preventing the administration from carrying out proof of citizenship requirements in election systems. 
The case is California v. 
Donald Trump, No. 25-cv-10810 in the U.S. 
District Court for the District of Massachusetts. 
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. 
Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.0%John Binder: 7.1%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 1.3%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 2.2%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 1.3%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.8%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%John Binder: 27.5%Breitbart: 11.8%Framing Effect14.4%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.6%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%John Binder: 10.4%Breitbart: 9.8%Negativity Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 3.2%Breitbart: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 2.2%Breitbart: 4.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 2.7%Breitbart: 2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 1.6%Breitbart: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%John Binder: 0.8%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.2%Breitbart: 2.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.1%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.2%John Binder: 7.9%Breitbart: 4.3%Appeal to Authority22.2%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 1.3%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.0%John Binder: 4.5%Breitbart: 8.0%Hasty Generalization7.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 7.8%Breitbart: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 1.4%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 1.1%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.0%John Binder: 1.9%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof10.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 2.6%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 2.2%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 2.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.4%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 10.0%John Binder: 3.1%Breitbart: 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection10.0%This article: 10.6%John Binder: 6.7%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice10.6%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.9%Breitbart: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 11.1%Breitbart: 7.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%John Binder: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

369 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker27%attributed speech269writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageDenise Casper • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 67 words • 0.0% coverageDenise Casper • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDenise Casper • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Denise Casper

100%flagged-word coverage
100 attributed words100% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+37.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Denise Casper: 37.0%37.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.5 ptsWriter: 14.5%Denise Casper: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Denise Casper: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.