Keyword summary
67% 16 analyzed articles/videos 10,169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Courts results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 6,686 hits . Analysis detected 56,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,582 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (29,829 of 34,582 keywords). This Federal Courts is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Federal Courts
Keyword details
Total words: 61,582
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score16 analyzed articles61.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst