Publication summary
84% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WhoWhatWhy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 1,054 hits . Analysis detected 6,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,652 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 70% (120 of 398 publications). This WhoWhatWhy is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,652
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst