Publication summary
80% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WhoWhatWhy results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 3,317 hits . Analysis detected 21,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,219 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 54% (192 of 410 publications). This WhoWhatWhy is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 23,219
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 14.3% 14.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 9.1% 9.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst