Author summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 1,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glenn Daigon results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 2,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,741 of 6,628 authors). This Glenn Daigon is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. Glenn Daigon
Author details
Total words: 4,380
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.7% 12.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst