Author summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whowhatwhy Editors results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 400 hits . Analysis detected 1,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,989 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,503 of 6,508 authors). This Whowhatwhy Editors is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Whowhatwhy Editors
Author details
Total words: 1,989
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst