Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Political Conflict results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 1,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,274 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Political Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Political Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 1,274
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 23.1% 23.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 18.9% 18.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Horn Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst