Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naruto Movie Adaptation results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,698 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,555 of 16,562 topics). This Naruto Movie Adaptation is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Naruto Movie Adaptation
Topic details
Total words: 1,698
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.3%16.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.7%12.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos