Publication summary
54% 71 analyzed articles/videos 36,528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inverse results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 44,594 hits . Analysis detected 218,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 210,157 analyzed words across 71 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (201 of 400 publications). This Inverse is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 210,157
Article count: 71
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score71 analyzed articles210.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 21.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst