Author summary
32% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Britt results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 5,217 hits . Analysis detected 22,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,595 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,473 of 6,628 authors). This Ryan Britt is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Ryan Britt
Author details
Total words: 30,595
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score10 analyzed articles30.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst