Author summary
40% 4 analyzed articles/videos 754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Rife results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 1,430 hits . Analysis detected 7,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,901 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,276 of 6,628 authors). This Katie Rife is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Katie Rife
Author details
Total words: 7,901
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst