BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Sunk Cost Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 1,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 585 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,347 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the article peer group.

Image courtesy of Fantasia International Film Festival Despite the massive popularity of his comics in Japan and abroad, no one has really been able to capture the spirit of Junji Ito on screen. 
The 2000 film version of Uzumaki  recently released on Blu-ray by Umbrella Entertainment  came close, as did the first episode of Adult Swim’s Uzumaki animated series . 
The rest has been variable, to say the least, which is why Inverse ’s interest was piqued when TV Tokyo announced the anthology TV series Strange: Junji Ito’s Tales for Sleepless Nights. 
The third episode of the anthology series, “The Rib Woman,” had its world premiere July 22 at the Fantasia International Film Festival in Montreal, and Inverse was present for the screening. 
The episode is directed by Yuta Shimotsu, whose previous features Best Wishes to All and New Group both dialed in to a specifically Japanese style of weirdness. 
(Shimotsu is one of three directors working on the series, all of whom are relatively new on the J-horror scene.) 
Shimotsu’s specialty is incorporating social commentary into bizarre horror tales, which makes him an ideal director for this project. 
So is it the bizarre Ito nightmare trip we’ve been waiting for? 
Not quite, but it’s getting there. 
The story stays relatively faithful to Ito’s original manga, which was published in English by Viz Media in the anthology Lovesickness . 
Rather than an afternoon at the beach, the TV version of “The Rib Woman” begins with Yuri (former idol Nagisa Saito) enviously watching her older brother’s girlfriend Ruriko try on a bathing suit in the mirror. 
Yuri wishes she had Ruriko’s tiny waist, and later that night she’s searching for advice when she gets an unsettling pop-up ad on her phone: “Would you like to remove unwanted bones?” 
It’s a laugh-out-loud absurd line, and Shimotsu’s deadpan style is well matched with Ito’s similarly dry sense of humor. 
This is undoubtedly a TV production made on a small budget, and Shimotsu leans on dream sequences  we get two within the span of about 10 minutes  to tell the story with a limited number of locations. 
Ruriko and Yuri’s brother Keisuke play smaller roles here than they do in the manga, as “The Rib Woman” keeps its focus on Yuri and her internal struggle. 
One memorable sequence comes late in the story, when Yuri visits a clinic straight out of a Silent Hill game to have her ribs removed  a real, but very extreme, method of slimming one’s waist. 
There are also standout moments of body horror: After her operation, Yuri starts seeing her bones move around like insects crawling under her skin, and the episode climaxes with a creepy-crawly gore shot that effectively brings the centerpiece panel from Ito’s comic to life. 
There are missed opportunities as well, as Shimotsu chooses to keep the madness-inducing song Yuri and Ruriko hear after undergoing the procedure inside of the characters’ heads. 
By the end of the episode, however, Yuri is a giggling, demented shell of her former self, marveling at her uncanny, VFX-enhanced figure in the mirror. 
Body-horror takes on beauty standards have been ubiquitous in horror over the past few years, but “The Rib Woman” finds a fresh perspective on the concept by staying close to its inspiration. 
Strange: Junji Ito’s Tales for Sleepless Nights is currently airing in Japan on TV Tokyo, and comes to America this fall on HBO Max. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.2%Katie Rife: 2.2%Inverse: 4.0%Confirmation Bias9.2%This article: 5.5%Katie Rife: 1.0%Inverse: 0.8%Anchoring Bias5.5%This article: 6.2%Katie Rife: 4.4%Inverse: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.2%This article: 8.7%Katie Rife: 2.5%Inverse: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 3.9%Inverse: 2.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.9%Inverse: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Katie Rife: 3.0%Inverse: 4.7%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.2%Inverse: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.5%Katie Rife: 0.6%Inverse: 0.7%Status Quo Bias7.5%This article: 11.6%Katie Rife: 1.2%Inverse: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect11.6%This article: 2.1%Katie Rife: 2.8%Inverse: 3.8%Optimism Bias2.1%This article: 6.3%Katie Rife: 2.0%Inverse: 2.1%Pessimism Bias6.3%This article: 21.0%Katie Rife: 5.4%Inverse: 8.7%Negativity Bias21.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Katie Rife: 1.8%Inverse: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error6.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.9%Inverse: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Katie Rife: 6.7%Inverse: 5.4%Halo Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Katie Rife: 2.5%Inverse: 1.9%Recency Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.5%Inverse: 0.8%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.9%Katie Rife: 3.7%Inverse: 2.7%Appeal to Authority7.9%This article: 2.1%Katie Rife: 0.8%Inverse: 2.1%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 1.0%Inverse: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.5%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.1%Katie Rife: 7.0%Inverse: 8.0%Hasty Generalization11.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.1%Katie Rife: 0.8%Inverse: 0.9%Bandwagon4.1%This article: 7.5%Katie Rife: 1.2%Inverse: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion7.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.1%Inverse: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.7%Katie Rife: 3.7%Inverse: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.2%Katie Rife: 0.8%Inverse: 0.5%Burden of Proof9.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.3%Inverse: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.6%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.0%Katie Rife: 1.8%Inverse: 1.3%Anecdotal5.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.0%Katie Rife: 1.8%Inverse: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.3%Inverse: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.5%Katie Rife: 6.2%Inverse: 1.6%Unattributed Quote5.5%This article: 5.5%Katie Rife: 3.2%Inverse: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection5.5%This article: 42.9%Katie Rife: 18.1%Inverse: 21.3%Biased Writer Voice42.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 2.1%Inverse: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Rife: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Katie Rife: 1.4%Inverse: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.1%

585 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.