Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Strange Junji Itos Tales For Sleepless Nights results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,755 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Strange Junji Itos Tales For Sleepless Nights is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Strange Junji Itos Tales For Sleepless Nights
Topic details
Total words: 1,755
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 39.0%39.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.9%3.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos