Author summary
58% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Grebey results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 3,069 hits . Analysis detected 15,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,047 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,792 of 6,316 authors). This James Grebey is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. James Grebey
Author details
Total words: 12,047
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.5% 25.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst