Author summary
37%11 analyzed articles/videos9,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lyvie Scott results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 8,120 hits. Analysis detected 36,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,275 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,957 of 6,244 authors). This Lyvie Scott is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Lyvie Scott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
21%Lyvie Scott (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 41,275
Article count: 11
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles41.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate