Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Kumamoto results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 1,229 hits. Analysis detected 6,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,056 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (804 of 6,316 authors). This Ian Kumamoto is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Ian Kumamoto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠88%Ian Kumamoto (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,056
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
6.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 40.2%40.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 23.6%23.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 29.7%29.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 12.3%12.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 29.7%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 23.6%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos