Speaker summary
50% 6 analyzed articles/videos 648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Holland results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Halo Effect , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 166 hits . Analysis detected 1,487.222 faulty-reasoning hits from 648 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,214 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Holland is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group. Tom Holland
Speaker details
Total words: 648
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.1% percentile 6.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos648 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst