Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saba Hamedy results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 310 hits . Analysis detected 2,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,928 of 6,628 authors). This Saba Hamedy is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Saba Hamedy
Author details
Total words: 2,652
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst