Author summary
57% 1 analyzed article/video 890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Dreyfuss results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 299 hits . Analysis detected 1,665 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,670 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,114 of 6,628 authors). This Emily Dreyfuss is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Emily Dreyfuss
Author details
Total words: 2,670
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst