Author summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Freedland results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,639 hits . Analysis detected 12,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,232 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,916 of 6,628 authors). This Jonathan Freedland is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Jonathan Freedland
Author details
Total words: 9,232
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst